Shason, Inc. v. International Private Label, Inc. et al
| Shason, Inc. |
| Forever 21, Inc., Moda Xpress, Inc., Clothingunder 10, Inc., International Private Label, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive and International Private Label, Inc. doing business as U.S. Off Price |
| 2:2018cv05925 |
| July 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| John E McDermott |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Shason, Inc.. (Baum, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shason, Inc., identifying Shason, Inc.; International Private Label, Inc. dba U.S. Off Price; Forever 21, Inc.; Clothingunder 10, Inc.; Moda Xpress, Inc.. (Baum, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shason, Inc.. (Baum, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Shason, Inc.. (Baum, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22050488 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Shason, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Design, #2 Exhibit 2 - Registration of Design, #3 Exhibit 3 - Photographs of Garment) (Attorney Michael Charles Baum added to party Shason, Inc.(pty:pla))(Baum, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
