Laura Munoz v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
| Laura Munoz |
| Does 1 through 10, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Babak Baradur-Bokaie and Northeast Valley Health Corporation |
| 2:2018cv06033 |
| July 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees OR Cost(Short Form) filed by Plaintiff Laura Munoz. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Laura Munoz, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Babak Baradur-Bokaie, Northeast Valley Health Corporation, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Does 1 through 10. Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Laura Munoz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
