Muhammad Usman v. Donna Campagnolo et al
| Muhammad Usman |
| District Director Donna Campagnolo, Secretary Kirstjen Nielson, Field Office Directo Joseph M. Hackbarth, Attorney General Jeff SESSIONS, Joseph M. Hackbarth, Kirstjen Nielson, Donna Campagnolo and Jeff Sessions |
| 2:2018cv06166 |
| July 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| George H Wu |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Muhammad Usman, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to A. Ahno. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to S. Frank. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to K. Lusby. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service, #2 Proof of Service, #3 Proof of Service, #4 Proof of Service, #5 Proof of Service, #6 Proof of Service)(Larios Shah, Lorena) |
Filing 9
Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendants Donna Campagnolo, Joseph M. Hackbarth, Kirstjen Nielson, Jeff Sessions. (mrgo) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #6 filed by Plaintiff Muhammad Usman. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Service List, #2 Supplement Face Page of Complaint)(Larios Shah, Lorena) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Muhammad Usman. (Larios Shah, Lorena) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Muhammad Usman, (Larios Shah, Lorena) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Muhammad Usman. (Larios Shah, Lorena) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22098700 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Muhammad Usman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration, #2 Exhibit Form I-130 Approval Notice, #3 Exhibit Form I-485 Receipt Notice, #4 Exhibit I-485 Interview Notice, #5 Exhibit Infopass Appointment, #6 Exhibit Letter served at Second Infopass Appointment, #7 Civil Cover Sheet CV-71, #8 AO-440, #9 CV-30) (Attorney Lorena Larios Larios Shah added to party Muhammad Usman(pty:pla))(Larios Shah, Lorena) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
