Jesus Aparicio v. Mike s T.H. Liquor, Inc., et al
Jesus Aparicio |
Does 1 through 10 inclusive, Mike s T.H. Liquor, Inc. and Mike s T.H. Liquor, Inc. doing business as Mike s Liquor |
2:2018cv06190 |
July 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Rozella A Oliver |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT. (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFIC) (bp) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Mike s T.H. Liquor, Inc. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jesus Aparicio, (Hong, Kevin) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jesus Aparicio. (Hong, Kevin) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jesus Aparicio. (Hong, Kevin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22103951 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jesus Aparicio. (Attorney Kevin Hyunjong Hong added to party Jesus Aparicio(pty:pla))(Hong, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.