Tina Foafoa v. Lakewood Marketplace LLC et al
| Tina Foafoa |
| KMS Foods, Inc., Lakewood Marketplace LLC and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2018cv06238 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Steve Kim |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant KMS Foods, Inc. #15 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Answer and/or Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Motion to Dismiss on file. (mrgo) |
Filing 16
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 10/29/2018 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 15 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant KMS Foods, Inc. filed by plaintiff Tina Foafoa. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Phyl Grace, #2 Proof of Service) (Grace, Phyl) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant KMS Foods, Inc., Lakewood Marketplace LLC, (Tumer, Ozgun) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant KMS Foods, Inc., Lakewood Marketplace LLC.(Attorney Ozgun K Tumer added to party KMS Foods, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Ozgun K Tumer added to party Lakewood Marketplace LLC(pty:dft))(Tumer, Ozgun) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tina Foafoa, upon Defendant Lakewood Marketplace LLC served on 9/7/2018, answer due 9/28/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe (Desk Lady) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. (Show Cause Response due by 9/17/2018.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tina Foafoa, upon Defendant KMS Foods, Inc. served on 8/12/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Abraham Doe (Manager) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES upon filing of the complaint by Judge Percy Anderson. (rfi)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants KMS Foods, Inc., Lakewood Marketplace LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Planitiff Tina Foafoa. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tina Foafoa, (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tina Foafoa. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22113163 - Fee: $400, filed by Planitiff Tina Foafoa. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Tina Foafoa(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
