Jimmy Lynn Brooks v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| Jimmy Lynn Brooks |
| Commissioner Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 2:2018cv06261 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV18-6261 DFM on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Patrick W Snyder added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Snyder, Patrick) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sn) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jimmy Lynn Brooks, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 8/10/2018, answer due 12/10/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal. (nbo)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (nbo) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick Granting #3 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (nbo)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jimmy Lynn Brooks, (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jimmy Lynn Brooks. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Jimmy Lynn Brooks. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jimmy Lynn Brooks. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Jimmy Lynn Brooks. (Attorney Lawrence D Rohlfing added to party Jimmy Lynn Brooks(pty:pla))(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
