Kilina America, Inc. v. Lost Wander, Inc. et al
KILINA AMERICA, INC. |
A'GACI, LLC., JILLIAN J YOO, JOHN WON, DOES 1-10, inclusive, BLOOMINGDALES, INC., NORDSTROM, INC., FOREVER 21 RETAIL, INC., LOST + WANDER, INC., Lost Wander, Inc. and A'Gaci, LLC |
2:2018cv06269 |
July 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Otis D Wright |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) Mailed closing report to Copyright Office (lc) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Kilina America, Inc.. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 17 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-06269 ODW(ASx). (rn) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Kilina America, Inc. pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) (A)(i) without prejudice as to Bloomingdales, Inc., Lost Wander, Inc., Nordstrom, Inc., Jillian J Yoo. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 15 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-06269 CBM(ASx). (rn) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kilina America, Inc., upon Defendant Jillian J Yoo served on 7/25/2018, answer due 8/15/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jillian J Yoo in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kilina America, Inc., upon Defendant Nordstrom, Inc. served on 7/25/2018, answer due 8/15/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kaj Trapp, Executive Assistant to Corporate Secretary, who is authorized to accept service on behalf of the Nordstrom, Inc. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #10 , Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #9 . The following error(s) was/were found: The summons and complaint did not have the executed summons attached to the proofs of service In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kilina America, Inc., upon Defendant Bloomingdales, Inc. served on 7/25/2018, answer due 8/15/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kris Mead, Legal Department, AN EMPLOYEE OF THE BUSINESS LISTED FOR THE NOTICED PARTY, AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT SERVICE in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons returned. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kilina America, Inc., upon Defendant John Won served on 7/24/2018, answer due 8/14/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon JOHN WON in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kilina America, Inc., upon Defendant A'Gaci, LLC served on 7/24/2018, answer due 8/14/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon JOHN WON, OWNER in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Bloomingdales, Inc., Forever 21 Retail, Inc., Lost Wander, Inc., Nordstrom, Inc., John Won, Jillian J Yoo. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by KILINA AMERICA, INC.. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff KILINA AMERICA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Attachment to Proposed Summons)(Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff KILINA AMERICA, INC., (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff KILINA AMERICA, INC.. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22120288 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff KILINA AMERICA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C) (Attorney Chan Yong Jeong added to party KILINA AMERICA, INC.(pty:pla))(Jeong, Chan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.