One SC, LLC v. E and K Vintage Wood, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: One SC, LLC
Defendant: Eric Freed, E&K Vintage Wood, Inc. and E and K Vintage Wood, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv06529
Filed: July 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Percy Anderson re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #12 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants may have a fourteen (14) day extension of time, up to and including September 18, 2018, to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned action. (mrgo)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 11/5/2018 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo)
September 18, 2018 Filing 13 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #11 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs filed by Defendants Eric Freed, E and K Vintage Wood, Inc..(Norris, Matthew)
September 18, 2018 Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Defendants Eric Freed, E and K Vintage Wood, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Matthew James Norris added to party E and K Vintage Wood, Inc. (pty:dft), Attorney Matthew James Norris added to party Eric Freed(pty:dft))(Norris, Matthew)
July 31, 2018 Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff One SC, LLC(Curry, K)
July 31, 2018 Filing 10 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff One SC, LLC, identifying Arthur Spector. (Curry, K)
July 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. Accordingly, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A district court may, and should, grant leave to amend when it appears that subject matter jurisdiction may exist, even though the complaint inadequately alleges jurisdiction. Therefore, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to amend the Complaint to establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, if any, is to be filed by August 13, 2018. The failure to file a First Amended Complaint by that date or to adequately allege the Court's jurisdiction may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (See document for details) (mrgo)
July 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
July 30, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh)
July 30, 2018 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants E and K Vintage Wood, Inc., Eric Freed. (lh)
July 30, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
July 30, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (lh)
July 27, 2018 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff One SC, LLC. (Curry, K)
July 27, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff One SC, LLC. (Curry, K)
July 27, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22164407 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff One SC, LLC. (Attorney K Todd Curry added to party One SC, LLC(pty:pla))(Curry, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: One SC, LLC v. E and K Vintage Wood, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Freed
Represented By: Matthew James Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E&K Vintage Wood, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E and K Vintage Wood, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew James Norris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: One SC, LLC
Represented By: K Todd Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?