Juan Carlos Suarez v. Stu Sherman
Juan Carlos Suarez |
Stu Sherman |
2:2018cv06605 |
August 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Suzanne H Segal |
Josephine L Staton |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A FEDERAL CLAIM; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES #5 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Part 1 of 2), #2 Exhibit 1 (Part 2 of 2), #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4 (Part 1 of 2), #6 Exhibit 4 (Part 2 of 2))(Heinisch, Jennifer) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A FEDERAL CLAIM; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Heinisch, Jennifer) |
Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jennifer L Heinisch counsel for Respondent Stu Sherman. Adding Jennifer L. Heinisch as counsel of record for Stu Sherman, Warden for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attorney Jennifer L Heinisch added to party Stu Sherman(pty:res))(Heinisch, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. IT IS ORDERED that: Within 14 days, Respondent shall file and serve a Notice of Appearance. (see document for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Blank Consent Form) (hr) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Juan Carlos Suarez. (car) (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Juan Carlos Suarez v. Stu Sherman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Suarez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Stu Sherman | |
Represented By: | Jennifer L Heinisch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.