Juan Carlos Suarez v. Stu Sherman
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Suarez
Respondent: Stu Sherman
Case Number: 2:2018cv06605
Filed: August 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Suzanne H Segal
Referring Judge: Josephine L Staton
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A FEDERAL CLAIM; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES #5 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Part 1 of 2), #2 Exhibit 1 (Part 2 of 2), #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4 (Part 1 of 2), #6 Exhibit 4 (Part 2 of 2))(Heinisch, Jennifer)
September 7, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A FEDERAL CLAIM; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Heinisch, Jennifer)
August 15, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jennifer L Heinisch counsel for Respondent Stu Sherman. Adding Jennifer L. Heinisch as counsel of record for Stu Sherman, Warden for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent Stu Sherman. (Attorney Jennifer L Heinisch added to party Stu Sherman(pty:res))(Heinisch, Jennifer)
August 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. IT IS ORDERED that: Within 14 days, Respondent shall file and serve a Notice of Appearance. (see document for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Blank Consent Form) (hr)
August 1, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car)
August 1, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Juan Carlos Suarez. (car) (car).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juan Carlos Suarez v. Stu Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juan Carlos Suarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stu Sherman
Represented By: Jennifer L Heinisch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?