Jose Ivan Salcedo v. James Dailey et al
Plaintiff: Jose Ivan Salcedo
Defendant: Known and Unkown, Caternolo and James Dailey
Case Number: 2:2018cv06613
Filed: August 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT #1 WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. If Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he shall file a First Amended Complaint no later than 30 days from the date of this Order. (See Order for complete details) (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint (Blank), #2 Notice of Dismissal (Blank)) (afe)
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar: granting #5 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $0.00 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (hr)
September 4, 2018 Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Jose Ivan Salcedo. (hr)
August 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: denying #2 Notice of Filing Complaint Without Prepayment of Filing Fees or APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (CV-93). (yl)
August 1, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap)
August 1, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (ghap)
August 1, 2018 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Caternolo, James Dailey, Known and Unkown pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar., filed by plaintiff Jose Ivan Salcedo. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Ivan Salcedo v. James Dailey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Known and Unkown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caternolo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Dailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Ivan Salcedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?