Joel Groch v. Dearborn National Life Insurance Company et al
Plaintiff: Joel Groch
Defendant: Dearborn National Life Insurance Company and Entertainment Industry Flex Plan
Case Number: 2:2018cv06614
Filed: August 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Consuelo B Marshall
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #13 granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Based on the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, Defendant Dearborn National Life Insurance Company shall have up to and including October 4, 2018, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint in this action. (bm)
August 31, 2018 Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Dearborn National Life Insurance Company answer now due 10/4/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Dearborn National Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Diana R Lotfi added to party Dearborn National Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Lotfi, Diana)
August 22, 2018 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joel Groch, upon Defendant Entertainment Industry Flex Plan served on 8/16/2018, answer due 9/6/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sean Dugan - Fund Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hefter, Mitchell)
August 22, 2018 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joel Groch, upon Defendant Dearborn National Life Insurance Company served on 8/14/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hefter, Mitchell)
August 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS). (ab)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-06614 CBM(Ex). (rn)
August 3, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Dean D. Pregerson for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:18-cv-06614 DDP(Ex). (rn)
August 3, 2018 Filing 7 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Joel Groch. (Hefter, Mitchell)
August 2, 2018 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Dearborn National Life Insurance Company, Entertainment Industry Flex Plan. (ghap)
August 2, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed) (ghap)
August 1, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JOEL GROCH, (Hefter, Mitchell)
August 1, 2018 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JOEL GROCH. (Hefter, Mitchell)
August 1, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JOEL GROCH. (Hefter, Mitchell)
August 1, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22184709 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff JOEL GROCH. (Attorney Mitchell O Hefter added to party JOEL GROCH(pty:pla))(Hefter, Mitchell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joel Groch v. Dearborn National Life Insurance Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dearborn National Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Diana R Lotfi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Entertainment Industry Flex Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joel Groch
Represented By: Mitchell O Hefter
Represented By: Corinne Chandler
Represented By: Glenn R Kantor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?