Pierre Armand Randall Windsor-Romanov v. Michael P. Judge et al
Pierre Armand Randall Windsor-Romanov |
Mark E. Widham, Jack Keenan, Marsha Revel, Michael P. Judge and Ron Brown |
2:2018cv06680 |
August 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andrew J Guilford |
John E McDermott |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, DENYING #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (es) |
RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #2 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(ch) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Pierre Armand Randall Windsor-Romanov. (et) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Michael P. Judge, Marsha Revel, Mark E Wimburn pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott., filed by Plaintiff Pierre Armand Randall Windsor-Romanov. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.