Young Hee Park v. KM-L Alliance, LLC
Plaintiff: Young Hee Park
Defendant: KM-L Alliance, LLC and Does 1-10 inclusive
Case Number: 2:2018cv06701
Filed: August 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. This action is dismissed. re: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) #9 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (vm)
September 17, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Young Hee Park. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Kim, Jong)
September 10, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff Young Hee Park. (Kim, Jong)
September 7, 2018 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Young Hee Park, upon Defendant KM-L Alliance, LLC served on 8/11/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mary Lee, Agent's Mother/ Authorized to accept for Tom W. Lee, Registered Agent. (Asian/ Female/ 60's/ 5'5"/ 130lbs/ Blk hair). in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, Jong)
August 6, 2018 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant KM-L Alliance, LLC. (et)
August 6, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV11C- Statement of Consent) (et)
August 3, 2018 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Young Hee Park, (Kim, Jong)
August 3, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Young Hee Park. (Kim, Jong)
August 3, 2018 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Young Hee Park. (Kim, Jong)
August 3, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22200891 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Young Hee Park. (Attorney Jong Yun Kim added to party Young Hee Park(pty:pla))(Kim, Jong)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young Hee Park v. KM-L Alliance, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KM-L Alliance, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Young Hee Park
Represented By: Jong Yun Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?