Raymond Alford Bradford v. E. Jordan et al
Plaintiff: Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant: E Jordan, C Wu and Debbie A.
Case Number: 2:2018cv06730
Filed: August 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 INITIAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (dts)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: granting #12 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee.. (dts)
October 1, 2018 Filing 12 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford. (dts)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER re: Plaintiff's September 3, 2018 Objection To The Court's Order Regarding Plaintiffs Failure To File A Request To Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, re Objection #10 , Order, #9 . If Plaintiff seeks to proceed with this lawsuit, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order he must either (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee; (2) submit to the Court the attached form to request in forma pauperis status; or (3) show cause in writing why he is unable to submit even a partially complete in forma pauperis request (CV-060P) form. (Attachments: #1 IFP APPLICATION) (dts)
September 7, 2018 Filing 10 OBJECTION to Order re: Failure to File Request to Proceed Informa Pauperis and Declaration in Support thereof, Objection #8 , Order,, #7 , Order, #9 filed by Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford. (dts)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER re: Plaintiffs Objection To The Courts Order Regarding Plaintiffs Failure To File A Request To Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 (Attachments: #1 COMPLAINT, #2 IFP APP) (dts)
August 22, 2018 Filing 8 OBJECTION to to Order Re: Failure to file Request to Proceed IFP,, #7 filed by Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford. (dts)
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER re: Failure to File Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, re NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order he must (1) pay the full $400.00 filing fee; (2) file a request for in forma pauperis status along with the necessary accompanying documents; or (3) show cause in writing why he is unable to do so. (Attachments: #1 IFP APPLICATION) (dts)
August 6, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car)
August 6, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (car)
August 6, 2018 Filing 4 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Eastern
August 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/6/2018 ORDERING CASE TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. (Henshaw, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/6/2018.]
August 6, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Raymond Alford Bradford. (Henshaw, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/6/2018.]
August 2, 2018 Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/7/2018 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Reader, L) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/6/2018.]
August 2, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Raymond Alford Bradford. (Reader, L) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/6/2018.]
August 1, 2018 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Debbie A., E. Jordan, C. Wu by Raymond Alford Bradford.(Reader, L) [Transferred from California Eastern on 8/6/2018.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raymond Alford Bradford v. E. Jordan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Debbie A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Alford Bradford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?