Laurie Kidd v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Laurie Kidd |
The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
2:2018cv06731 |
August 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(Ellis, Patricia) |
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2018 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (dp) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America, identifying The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Prudential Financial, Inc. (Attorney Linda Marie Lawson added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(Lawson, Linda) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Prudential Insurance Company of America answer now due 10/4/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America.(Attorney Patricia A Ellis added to party The Prudential Insurance Company of America(pty:dft))(Ellis, Patricia) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Laurie Kidd, upon Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America served on 8/13/2018, answer due 9/4/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Albert Damonte of CT Corporation Registered Agent for Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bather, Phillip) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dp) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff LAURIE KIDD. (Bather, Phillip) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff LAURIE KIDD, (Bather, Phillip) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff LAURIE KIDD. (Bather, Phillip) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22205722 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff LAURIE KIDD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint (part 1 of 2), #2 Exhibit A to Complaint (part 2 of 2)) (Attorney Phillip S Bather added to party LAURIE KIDD(pty:pla))(Bather, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.