Daniel Korzeniewski v. GOPACKUP, Inc. et al
Daniel Korzeniewski |
Does 1 through 10 and GOPACKUP, Inc. |
2:2018cv06748 |
August 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dean D Pregerson |
Karen L Stevenson |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than October 22, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's filing of a NOTICED MOTION for entry of default judgment. In accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. (shb) |
Filing 14 TEXT ONLY ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: In light of the Request for Clerk to Enter Default #12 , the Order to Show Cause #11 , is DISCHARGED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 13 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to GOPACKUP, Inc. (shb) |
Filing 12 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant GOPACKUP, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Daniel Korzeniewski. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing no later than September 27, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (pg) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daniel Korzeniewski, upon Defendant GOPACKUP, Inc. served on 8/9/2018, answer due 8/30/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon LegalZoom.com.,Inc C/O Melanie Stroman - Authorized Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address ishttp://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for further details. (shb) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant GOPACKUP, Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Daniel Korzeniewski. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Daniel Korzeniewski. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daniel Korzeniewski. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daniel Korzeniewski, (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22208501 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Daniel Korzeniewski. (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Daniel Korzeniewski(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.