Deshon Aaron Atkins v. W. L. Montgomery
| Deshon Aaron Atkins |
| W. L. Montgomery |
| 2:2018cv06877 |
| August 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| David O Carter |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. that Respondent W. L. Montgomery file Answer to the Petition not later than 11/19/2018. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 11/5/2018. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (sbou)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL of filed by Petitioner Deshon Aaron Atkins. (sbou) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS #1 by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. It appears from the record now before the Court that the instant Petition is subject to dismissal as a mixed petition. Out of consideration for Petitioner's pro per status, the Court will afford him thirty (30) days from the service date of this Minute Order to elect one of the foregoing three options (see order for details). (hr) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis, submitted with his petition filed on August 10, 2018, #1 is GRANTED. It is so ordered. (wr)
|
| Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Deshon Aaron Atkins. The Petitioner does not consent. (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE.), filed by Petitioner Deshon Aaron Atkins. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Deshon Aaron Atkins v. W. L. Montgomery | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: W. L. Montgomery | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Deshon Aaron Atkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
