Bryan Jordan v. Xanitos, Inc.
| Bryan Jordan |
| Xanitos, Inc., Does 11-20, individuals, Does 1-10, business entities, forms unknown and Does 21-30, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv07020 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu, re Status Report #13 . (Scheduling Conference reset for 11/15/2018 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 13 STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff Bryan Jordan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McCoy Payton, Chantal) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/4/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 10/18/2018 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 11
Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-07020 GW(RAOx). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Xanitos, Inc., re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #7 served on Notice of Assignment. (Lee, Jamie) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Xanitos, Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/14/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL](lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Does, Does, Xanitos, Inc., Does 1-10, Does 11-20, Does 21-30, filed by Plaintiff Bryan Jordan. #1 [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/28/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL] (lh) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Xanitos, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Related Case(s) #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 08/15/2018. (Lee, Jamie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Xanitos, Inc.. (Lee, Jamie) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Xanitos, Inc. (Lee, Jamie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Xanitos, Inc., (Lee, Jamie) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Xanitos, Inc.. (Lee, Jamie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles, CA, case number BC711919 Receipt No: 0973-22260166 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Xanitos, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Plaintiff, #2 Declaration of Jamie Y. Lee, #3 Exhibit A - Lee Declaration, #4 Exhibit B - Lee Declaration, #5 Declaration of Edward Crothall, #6 Exhibit A - Crothall Declaration) (Attorney Jamie Y Lee added to party Xanitos, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lee, Jamie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
