Glen W. Robison v. Weingart Transitional Center Association et al
| Glen W. Robison and Glen W Robison |
| Joseph Garcia, Kevin Matthews, Dave Jones and Weingart Transitional Center Association |
| 2:2018cv07067 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Karen E Scott |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Notice of Change of Address. Plaintiff states that he received the R&R on September 28, 2018. The Court therefore extends Plaintiff's deadline to file objections to the R&R to November 8, 2018. Since it appears that Plaintiff has received the R&R and that the Court now has his updated address (812 E. 4th Place), the Clerk need take no additional action at this time. (jdo) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Objection filed by Plaintiff Glen W Robison. (sbou) |
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott re Notice of Change of Address. The Court therefore hereby extends Plaintiff's deadline to file objections to the R&R to October 26, 2018, and directs the Clerk to send an additional copy of the R&R issued on August 29, 2018 to 813 E. 4th Place, Los Angeles, CA 90013. (Attachments: #1 Report and Recommendation) (jdo)
|
| Filing 9 Mail Returned addressed to Glen W. Robison AU7939, California Health Care Facility, PO Box 32290, Stockton, CA 95312. (Paroled) re Report and Recommendation (Issued), #6 . (sbou) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS): Order re Notice of Change of Address by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's deadline to file objections to the R&R is extended to 10/5/2018. (jp)
|
| Filing 7 Change of address Changing pro se address to 813 E. 4th Place, Los Angeles, California 90013. Filed by Plaintiff Glen W. Robison. (jp) Modified on 9/28/2018 to reflect correct address (jdo). |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott #1 #3 . For the reasons discussed above, the Court recommends that Plaintiff's IFP application be denied because Plaintiff had at least three strikes prior to filing the instant action under 1915(g) of the PLRA. Additionally, the Court recommends that Plaintiff's IFP request be denied and this case be dismissed for failure to state a claim. If it is later determined that Plaintiff does not already have three strikes, then this denial will count against Plaintiff for purposes of the three-strikes rule in 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (jdo) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Objections to R&R due by 9/21/2018. (jdo) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Glen W. Robison. (esa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Civil Rights Complaint; EXHIBITS supporting filed by Plaintiff Glen W. Robison. (esa) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendantsJoseph Garcia, Dave Jones, Kevin Matthews, Weingart Transitional Center Association pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge Virginia A. Phillips and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, filed by plaintiff Glen W. Robison. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
