Nicholas Hopewell v. SBL Corporation et al
| Nicholas Hopewell |
| Does 1 through 10, SBL Corporation, SBL Corporation doing business as Beas Bakery and SUNSET LADERA, LLC |
| 2:2018cv07171 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Hopewell. (Kim, John) |
Filing 24
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. Dkt. #23 . (ake)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Hopewell. (Kim, John) |
|
Filing 22
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING Defendant SBL Corporation dba Beas Bakery for Lack of Prosecution (DKT. 18 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court orders Defendant SBL Corporation dba Beas Bakery DISMISSED for lack of prosecution and failure to follow the Courts Order. (jp)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER Re: Stipulation to Extend Time for Filing Responsive Pleading #20 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The due date of Defendant's responsive pleading(s) to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is continued from on 1/10/2019 until 2/11/2019. (jp)
|
| Filing 20 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to SUNSET LADERA, LLC answer now due 2/11/2019, re Amended Complaint/Petition #15 filed by Defendant SUNSET LADERA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING)(Attorney Dennis J Walsh added to party SUNSET LADERA, LLC(pty:dft))(Walsh, Dennis) |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicholas Hopewell, upon Defendant SUNSET LADERA, LLC served on 1/4/2019, answer due 1/25/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, John) |
|
Filing 18
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION (DKT. 9 11 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: This case was filed on August 16, 2018. Dkt. #1 . On November 18, 2018, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution for Plaintiff's failure to file a proof of service indicating that Defendants were served with the summons and Complaint (the "OSC"). Dkt. 9 . Plaintiff filed a timely response to the OSC. The Proof of Service states that Defendants were served with the summons and Compliant on October 21, 2018, causing the response to the Complaint to be filed on or before November 13, 2018. Dkt. #10 . Defendants did not file a response to the Complaint. Accordingly, the Court continued the OSC to December 10, 2018, to permit Plaintiff the opportunity to file a request for the entry of default. Dkt. 11 . On December 7, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Request for the Entry of Default (Dkt. #12 ) (the "Request"). Plaintiff withdrew the Request on the same date. Dkt. #13 #14 . Plaintiff failed to file a timely response to the OSC. However, on December 19, 2018, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (the "FAC"). Dkt. #15 . The Court will accept the late-filed FAC. However, Plaintiffs shall serve the FAC on Defendants and file a proof of service no later than January 9, 2019. This case has been pending for four months and this is the third time the Court has had to continue the OSC due to Plaintiff's failure to adhere to the Local Rules with respect to the deadlines. Moreover, it is not an efficient use of judicial resources. There will be no further continuances of this matter. A failure to file the proofs of service or to adhere to the deadlines set by this Court will result in the dismissal of the action. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #15 as to Defendant SUNSET LADERA, LLC. (bp) |
| Filing 16 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #15 filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Hopewell. (Kim, John) |
| Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant SUNSET LADERA, LLC amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Hopewell(Kim, John) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Hopewell. correcting REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant SBL Corporation #12 (Kim, John) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Hopewell. correcting REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant SBL Corporation #12 (Kim, John) |
| Filing 12 [WITHDRAWN PER DKT. #13 #14 ) REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant SBL Corporation filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Hopewell. (Kim, John) Modified on 12/17/2018 (ake). |
|
Filing 11
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION (DKT. 9 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court issued an Order to Show Cause for Lack of Prosecution on November 18, 2018 (Dkt. 9) (the "OSC"). Plaintiff was directed to file a proof of service by November 30, 2018, showing that Defendant was served with the Complaint and initiating documents. The Proof of Service states that Defendant was served with the Complaint and initiating documents on October 21, 2018. Dkt. #10 . Because the date has past by which Defendant was to timely respond to the Complaint, the Court CONTINUES the OSC to December 10, 2018. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application requesting the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the OSC. The OSC will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicholas Hopewell, upon Defendant SBL Corporation served on 10/21/2018, answer due 11/13/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kim, John) |
|
Filing 9
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than November 30, 2018, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). An action may be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS) (bp) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant SBL Corporation. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff NICHOLAS HOPEWELL, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff NICHOLAS HOPEWELL. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff NICHOLAS HOPEWELL. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22265519 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff NICHOLAS HOPEWELL. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party NICHOLAS HOPEWELL(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
