Elliot Pershes v. USA Fitness Center et al
Elliot Pershes |
DOES 1-10 Inclusive, USA Fitness Center and USA Fitness Center doing business as USA Fitness Center |
United States of America |
2:2018cv07258 |
August 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rozella A Oliver |
Otis D Wright |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. § 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Anjali Motgi on behalf of Intervenor United States of America (Attorney Anjali Motgi added to party United States of America(pty:intv))(Motgi, Anjali) |
Filing 20 RESPONSE filed by Intervenor United States of America Acknowledging Constitutional Question and Conditionally Requesting Additional Time (Motgi, Anjali) |
Filing 19 ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT VALLEY GYM CORP.S MOTION TO DISMISS OR,ALTERNATIVELY, STAY THE ACTION #18 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The parties request to continue the hearing is GRANTED. The hearing on Defendants Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Stay the Action is hereby continued to January 28, 2019 at 1:30 P.M. #10 . The time for filing and serving opposing papers and reply papers 21 days and 14 days, respectively, preceding the new hearing date. Plaintiffs Opposition will be due January 7, 2019, and Defendants Reply will be due January 14, 2019. (lc) |
Filing 18 Second STIPULATION to Continue Hearing On Defendant Valley Gym Corp's (dba USA Fitness Center) Motion To Dismiss Or, Alternatively, Stay The Action from January 7, 2019 to January 28, 2019 filed by Defendant USA Fitness Center. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Continuing Hearing)(Cheng, Jamie) |
Filing 17 ORDER ON CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT VALLEY GYM CORP.S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, ALTERNATIVELY, STAY THE ACTION TO January 7, 2019 at 1:30 P.M. #10 . Plaintiffs Opposition will be due December 10, 2018, and Defendants Reply will be due December 17, 2018. #16 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) Modified on 10/26/2018 (lc). |
Filing 16 STIPULATION to Continue Hearing on Motion to Dismiss from November 26, 2018 at 1:30 pm to December 31, 2018 at 1:30 pm Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or, Alternatively, Stay the Action #10 filed by Defendant USA Fitness Center. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Continuing Hearing On Defendant Valley Gym Corp.'s Motion To Dismiss Or, Alternatively, Stay The Action)(Cheng, Jamie) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jamie Mei Cheng on behalf of Defendant USA Fitness Center (Attorney Jamie Mei Cheng added to party USA Fitness Center(pty:dft))(Cheng, Jamie) |
Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant USA Fitness Center (Hosp, F) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant USA Fitness Center, (Hosp, F) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Constitutional Challenge to Federal Statute filed by defendant USA Fitness Center. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hosp, F) |
Filing 11 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or, Alternatively, Stay the Action #10 filed by Defendant USA Fitness Center. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - FCC Public Notice Seeking Comments Following ACA International, #2 Exhibit B - FCC Public Notice Seeking Comments Following Marks v. Crunch San Diego, #3 Exhibit C - Complaint filed in Bezdikian v. Valley Gym Corp., et al.,)(Hosp, F) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or, Alternatively, Stay the Action filed by defendant USA Fitness Center. Motion set for hearing on 11/26/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney F Phillip Hosp added to party USA Fitness Center(pty:dft)) (Hosp, F) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to USA Fitness Center answer now due 10/23/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Elliot Pershes.(Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant USA Fitness Center. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Elliot Pershes. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Elliot Pershes. (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Elliot Pershes, (Friedman, Todd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22275628 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Elliot Pershes. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Elliot Pershes(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.