David Hernandez v. Young Kee Kang et al
| DAVID HERNANDEZ |
| DOES 1 through 10, YOUNG KEE KANG and Young Kee Kang doing business as Grandview Liquor |
| 2:2018cv07275 |
| August 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (cb) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Young Kee Kang. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff DAVID HERNANDEZ, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff DAVID HERNANDEZ. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff DAVID HERNANDEZ. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22277669 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff DAVID HERNANDEZ. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party DAVID HERNANDEZ(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
