Bryan Williams v. Ted Baker Limited et al
Bryan Williams |
Ted Baker Limited and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
2:2018cv07416 |
August 23, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
John F Walter |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE #21 by Judge John F. Walter. The Court, having considered the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 20 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 5/3/2019 at 10:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 5/10/2019 at 10:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 5/21/2019 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv) |
Filing 19 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on November 19, 2018 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: February 4, 2019. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: February 8, 2019. (iv) |
Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 Days, filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams.. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 17 Corrected NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ted Baker Limited, identifying Plaintiff Bryan Williams; Defendant Ted Baker Limited. (Woo, Chadwick) |
Filing 16 Text Entry Order: Counsel shall immediately correct the deficiency in docket entry #14 as noted in the Clerk's notice of deficiency #15 .THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Interested Parties #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Case number reads CV 16-09486-DSF-E. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ted Baker Limited, identifying Plaintiff Bryan Williams; Defendant Ted Baker Limited. (Woo, Chadwick) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Ted Baker Limited.(Woo, Chadwick) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for November 19, 2018 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before November 5, 2018. (iv) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ted Baker Limited answer now due 10/18/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Ted Baker Limited.(Attorney Chadwick Craig Woo added to party Ted Baker Limited(pty:dft))(Woo, Chadwick) |
Filing 9 DECLARATION of Scott J. Ferrell re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ted Baker Limited. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Ferrell, Scott) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22308084 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Attorney Scott J Ferrell added to party Bryan Williams(pty:pla))(Ferrell, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.