Ruth Olvera v. DaVita, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ruth Olvera
Defendant: DaVita, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv07534
Filed: August 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: John E McDermott
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER APPROVING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #12 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Defendant DaVita, Inc. shall have through November 26, 2018 to answer, move or otherwise plead with respect to the initial Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
October 24, 2018 Filing 12 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to November 26, 2018 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant DaVita, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stilestein, Nora)
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS- TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE GEE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Please take notice that this action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge, pursuant to the Order re Reassignment Pursuant to General Order 16-05 filed on October 3, 2018. Additional information about Judge Gee's procedures and schedules is available on the court's website at www.cacd.uscourt.gov. The case number will now read CV 18-07534-DMG (JEMx) (See document for further details). Court Reporter. Not Reported. (et)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-07534 DMG(JEMx). (rn)
September 24, 2018 Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to DaVita, Inc. answer now due 10/25/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant DaVita, Inc..(Attorney Nora Kathleen Stiles added to party DaVita, Inc.(pty:dft))(Stiles, Nora)
September 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Christina A. Snyder for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-07534 CAS(JEMx). (rn)
September 5, 2018 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed Ruth Olvera, upon Defendant DaVita, Inc. served on 9/4/2018, answer due 10/4/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were NOT executed upon the United States Attorneys Office which was NOT served. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. The officer agency or corporation was NOT served. Service was executed in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Bradley, Marcus)
August 29, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet, 2 Unredacted Document Summons, 3 Unredacted Document Notice of Interested Parties are attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap)
August 29, 2018 Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant DaVita, Inc. (ghap)
August 29, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
August 29, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap)
August 28, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22332638 - Fee: $400, filed by Ruth Olvera Ruth Olvera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Unredacted Document Summons, #3 Unredacted Document Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney Marcus J Bradley added to party Ruth Olvera(pty:pla))(Bradley, Marcus)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruth Olvera v. DaVita, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruth Olvera
Represented By: Marcus J Bradley
Represented By: Kiley Lynn Grombacher
Represented By: Taylor L Emerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DaVita, Inc.
Represented By: Nora Kathleen Stilestein
Represented By: Derek Richard Havel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?