Martin Kenny and Co. v. Roger Corman et al
| Martin Kenny and Co. |
| Bay City Productions, Inc., Roger Corman, Brian Corman and Brain Corman |
| 2:2018cv07767 |
| September 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 77
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #71 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
|
| Filing 75 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #73 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events - select - Other Filings - select - Stipulations - select - Dismiss Case. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
|
Filing 76
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #66 filed by Bay City Productions, Inc., Roger Corman, Brian Corman. CCA # 21-55482. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (docket entry no. 7), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. As stated in the stipulated motion, each side shall bear its own costs and fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. (shb)
|
| Filing 74 NOTICE OF LODGING filed 58109- Bay City re Miscellaneous Document #73 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 73 58109 -Bay City (Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 72 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to Dismiss Case #71 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 71 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Attorney for Plaintiff Martin Kenny and Co..(Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 70 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Marcio Vasconcellos counsel for Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. Marcio Vasconcellos is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondents ROGER CORMAN, BRIAN CORMAN, AND BAY CITY PRODUCTIONS, INC.. (Vasconcellos, Marcio) |
| Filing 69 DESIGNATION of Record on Appeal by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman re #66 (May, Gregory) |
| Filing 68 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Gregory Thomas May counsel for Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. Adding Greg May as counsel of record for Roger Corman; Brian Corman; Bay City Productions, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondents/Appellants Roger Corman; Brian Corman; Bay City Productions, Inc.. (Attorney Gregory Thomas May added to party Bay City Productions, Inc.(pty:res), Attorney Gregory Thomas May added to party Brian Corman(pty:res), Attorney Gregory Thomas May added to party Roger Corman(pty:res))(May, Gregory) |
| Filing 67 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 21-55482 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #66 as to Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. (shb) |
| Filing 66 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. Appeal of Order on Request for Order,, Order on Motion to Exclude,,, #65 . (Appeal Fee - $505 Fee Paid, Receipt No. BCACDC-31275915.) (May, Gregory) |
|
Filing 65
ORDER RE: PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD #39 #43 #51 #52 #53 #55 #57 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. The petition to confirm the arbitration award is GRANTED. See order for details. (lom)
|
|
Filing 64
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS- ORDER RE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall denying #51 MOTION to Seal Document: Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.2.2(a)(iii)-(iv), Defendants have not filed a redacted version or an unredacted version of the proposed documents to be filed under seal. Accordingly, the application is denied. (bm)
|
|
Filing 63
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The Court finds that the following motions: Petitioners motion to confirm arbitration award, #17 #31 ; Respondents motion for leave to file under seal, #51 ; Respondents objections to improper reply evidence, #52 ; Respondents petition to confirm arbitration award, #58 currently set for hearing on May 19, 2020, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, this motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. No appearances are necessary on May 19, 2020. A written order will issue. (shb)
|
|
Filing 62
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS - NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF COURT ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: On the Courts own motion, the Respondents petition to confirm arbitration award #58 , currently scheduled for March 24, 2020, is hereby ordered continued to May 19, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (shb)
|
|
Filing 61
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS - NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF COURT ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: On the Courts own motion, the following motions: Petitioners motion to confirm arbitration award #17 #31 ; Respondents motion for leave to file under seal #51 and Respondents objections to improper reply evidence #52 , currently scheduled for March 24, 2020, are hereby ordered continued to May 19, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (shb)
|
| Filing 60 to Additional Filed Documents Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Supplement Declarations re Reply (Motion related), #50 #58 , APPLICATION to Exclude Improper Sur-Reply Evidence #55 and any documents filed by Respondents after March 5, 2020 filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co.. (Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 59 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Supplement Declarations re Reply (Motion related), #50 #58 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 58 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Supplement Declarations re Reply (Motion related), #50 filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. Motion set for hearing on 3/24/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Second Supplemental Declaration of Roger Corman, #2 Declaration Second Supplemental Declaration of Brian Corman) (O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 57 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. (O'Malley, Nathan) Modified on 3/31/2021 (shb). |
| Filing 56 OBJECTIONS to Supplement(Motion related) #54 Reply to Petitioner's Objection to Additional Supplemental Declaration of Marcio Vasconcellos filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. (O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 55 APPLICATION to Exclude Improper Sur-Reply Evidence filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. Application set for hearing on 3/24/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order) (O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 54 SUPPLEMENT Objection to Additional Supplemental Declaration of Marcio Vasconcellos filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co.. (Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 53 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of Petition and in Response to Surreply Brief filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Response to Surreply, #2 Supplement Request for Judicial Notice)(Walker, Lorna) Modified on 3/31/2021 (shb). |
| Filing 52 APPLICATION to Exclude Petitioner's Evidence filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. Application set for hearing on 3/24/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order) (O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 51 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to file document Declarations of Brian Corman and Roger Corman under seal filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 50 REPLY in opposition to motion filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Brian Corman, #2 Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Roger Corman, #3 Declaration Additional Supplemental Declaration of Marcio Vasconcellos)(O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 49 DECLARATION of Martin Kenney re Reply (Motion related), #43 in Support of Motion to Confirm Arbitration filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Supplemental of Lorna Walker)(Walker, Lorna) |
|
Filing 48
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING (DKT. NO. 46, 47) AND EX PARTE APPLICATION APPLICATION TO STRIKE REPLY EVIDENCE (DKT. NO. 440 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The Court approves the stipulation, but sets the following the following dates and restrictions. The court approves the following dates and restrictions: Respondents surreply and Petitioners response to the surreply may only address the following issues: (1) whether the arbitration agreement provided Respondents am opportunity to present their case. (2) whether the appointment of the arbitrator was in accordance with the arbitration agreement entered into between the parties, and (3) whether Respondent's notice of the arbitration complied with due process and the UNCITRAL Rules. The briefs may not exceed 10 pages. Respondent may file a surreply no later than March 5, 2020. Petitioner may file a response to the surreply no later than March 12, 2020. The hearing on the petition is continued to March 24, 2020 at 10:00 0a.m. Therefore Respondent's ex parte application is DENIED as moot. (shb)
|
| Filing 47 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Hearing on Motion from March 3, 2020 to April 7, 2020 Re: Stipulation to Continue,, #46 filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 46 STIPULATION to Continue Hearing on Motion from March 3, 2020 to April 7, 2020 Re: Response in Opposition to Motion, #45 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines,, #42 , Reply (Motion related), #43 , EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Reply Evidence Reply (Motion related), #43 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from March 3, 2020 Re: Reply (Motion related), #43 #44 filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Nathan D. O'Malley, #2 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 45 OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Reply Evidence Reply (Motion related), #43 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from March 3, 2020 Re: Reply (Motion related), #43 #44 filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Opposition to Ex Parte, #2 Declaration in Support of Opposition to Ex Parte)(Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 44 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Reply Evidence Reply (Motion related), #43 , EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Hearing from March 3, 2020 Re: Reply (Motion related), #43 filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Marcio Vasconcellos, #3 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order) (O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 43 REPLY Reply in Support of Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Dec. of Kenney in Support of Reply, #2 Declaration Dec. of Lorna Walker in Support of Reply, #3 Declaration Dec. of Frankston in Support of Reply, #4 Letter Request for Judicial Notice)(Walker, Lorna) Modified on 3/31/2021 (shb). |
|
Filing 42
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: re: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The Court will treat Petitioner's Notice of Petition and Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award (Dkt No. 1) as if it had been filed as a noticed motion in compliance with the Court's orders. The Court sets the following dates: Petitioner may file a reply in support of its petition on or before February 18, 2020. A Hearing on the petition is set on March 3, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (shb)
|
| Filing 41 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents), #40 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 40 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman, re Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition,, #38 , Request for Judicial Notice, #39 Via U.S. Mail to Daniel S Frankston served on 12/11/2019. (Vasconcellos, Marcio) |
| Filing 39 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Proposed Order)(Attorney Marcio Vasconcellos added to party Roger Corman(pty:res))(Vasconcellos, Marcio) Modified on 3/31/2021 (shb). |
| Filing 38 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition filed by Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brian Corman, Roger Corman. to Petition and Notice of Hearing on Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award Re: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case #17 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Brian Corman, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Declaration of Roger Corman, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Declaration of Marcio Vasconcellos, #8 Exhibit A, #9 Exhibit B, #10 Exhibit C, #11 Exhibit D, #12 Exhibit E, #13 Exhibit F, #14 Exhibit G, #15 Exhibit H, #16 Exhibit I, #17 Exhibit J)(Vasconcellos, Marcio) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Martin Kenny and Co., upon Defendant Acknowledgment of Service signed by Marcio Vasconcellos, Attorney. (Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Defendant Martin Kenny and Co., upon Plaintiff Acknowledgment of Service signed by Marcio Vasconcellos, Attorney. (Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Martin Kenny and Co., upon Defendant All Parties. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Marcio Vasconcellos, Attorney. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Notice And Acknowledgement Of Receipt, #2 Supplement Notice And Acknowledgement of Receipt)(Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents), #33 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events Service Documents Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints select - Notice and Acknowledgment of Service (CV-21) Executed. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 33 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Martin Kenny and Co., served on 10/28/19. (Attachments: #1 Signed Application Notice And Acknowledgement Of Receipt, #2 Signed Application Notice And Acknowledgement of Receipt)(Walker, Lorna) |
|
Filing 32
MINUTES: IN CHAMBERS-ORDER RE RENOTICE OF HEARING ON PETITION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Petitioner filed a renotice that purports to set a hearing on the petition to confirm the arbitral award for October 29, 2019. (Dkt. No. 31.) The Court previously struck a similar notice of hearing for failure to comply with the local rules. (Dkt. No. 7.) Accordingly, the renotice is improper and hereby STRUCK. No hearing will be held on October 29, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
| Filing 31 **STRICKEN** NOTICE Renotice Of Hearing On Petitiion To Confirm Arbitration Award filed by Plaintiff Martin Kenny and Co.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Confirming Arbitral Award)(Walker, Lorna) Modified on 10/7/2019 (yl). |
| Filing 30 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nathan David O'Malley counsel for Respondent Roger Corman. Adding Marcio Vasconcellos as counsel of record for Roger Corman, Brian Corman and Bay City Productions, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent Roger Corman. (O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 29 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Nathan David O'Malley counsel for Respondent Roger Corman. Adding Nathan D. O'Malley as counsel of record for Roger Corman, Brian Corman and Bay City Productions, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent Roger Corman. (Attorney Nathan David O'Malley added to party Roger Corman(pty:res))(O'Malley, Nathan) |
|
Filing 28
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS-ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The Court is in receipt of the stipulation to continue the hearing on petitioner's petition to confirm arbitration award against Brian Corman & Bay City Productions, Inc., #24 . The Court having read and considered said stipulation, hereby grants the stipulation and the hearing is continued to October 29, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. (shb)
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Granting #19 Request to Substitute Attorneys of Nathan D. O'Malley and Marcio Vasconellos for Respondent Brian Corman in place and instead of Attorney Joshua R Furman. Attorney Joshua R Furman terminated (shb)
|
| Filing 26 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #23 , Notice of Appearance #22 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #21 , Notice of Appearance #20 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 24 STIPULATION to Continue Hearing on Petitioner Martin Kenney & Co.'s Notice of Hearing in support of Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award from 9/24/2019 to 10/29/19 Re: MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case #17 filed by and Bay City Productions, Inc.; Respondent Brian Corman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Continuing Hearing to 10/29/2019)(O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Nathan David O'Malley on behalf of Respondent Bay City Productions, Inc. (Attorney Nathan David O'Malley added to party Bay City Productions, Inc.(pty:res))(O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Nathan David O'Malley on behalf of Respondent Brian Corman (Attorney Nathan David O'Malley added to party Brian Corman(pty:res))(O'Malley, Nathan) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Marcio Vasconcellos on behalf of Respondent Brian Corman (Vasconcellos, Marcio) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Marcio Vasconcellos on behalf of Respondent Bay City Productions, Inc. (Attorney Marcio Vasconcellos added to party Bay City Productions, Inc.(pty:res))(Vasconcellos, Marcio) |
| Filing 19 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Nathan D. O'Malley in place of attorney Joshua R. Furman filed by Respondent Brian Corman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney) (Attorney Marcio Vasconcellos added to party Brian Corman(pty:res)) (Vasconcellos, Marcio) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co. to OSC re: Dismissal (Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF HEARING with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 09/07/2018,, filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co..(Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Martin Kenny and Co., To Confirm Arbitration Award served on April 1, 2019. (Walker, Lorna) |
|
Filing 15
IN CHAMBERS - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before AUGUST 23, 2019 why this action should not bedismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Proof(s) of service of summons and complaint on the defendant(s)/respondents: An answer by the following defendant(s): In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all defendants; Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Plaintiff's request that the clerk enter default judgment or plaintiff's noticed motion for entry of default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. See order for further details. (shb)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS-ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The Court finds that the Scheduling Conference is not necessary in this case. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary on April 16, 2019. The Court further denies the request to appear telephonically #12 as moot. (shb)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION for Leave of Daniel Frankston to Appear for Application for Telephonic Appearance at Scheduling Conference #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION for Leave of Daniel Frankston to Appear for Application for Telephonic Appearance at Scheduling Conference filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co.. Application set for hearing on 4/16/2019 at 09:30 AM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (Walker, Lorna) |
| Filing 11 STATEMENT Petitioner's Scheduing Conference Statement (Walker, Lorna) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: On the Courts own motion, this case is set for a Scheduling Conference on APRIL 16, 2019 at 9:30 A. M. pursuant to FRCP 16(b). Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the Scheduling Conference. Counsel shall file a Rule 26(f) discovery plan no later than 7 days prior to the Scheduling Conference and pursuant to the Court's Standing Order (See minutes for further details) (yl)
|
| Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joshua R Furman counsel for Respondent Brian Corman. Adding Joshua R. Furman as counsel of record for Brian Corman for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent Brian Corman. (Attorney Joshua R Furman added to party Brian Corman(pty:res))(Furman, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Respondent Brian Cormanto Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Furman, Joshua) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS- ORDER RE NOTICE OF HEARING by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Accordingly, Petitioner's notice of hearing is hereby STRUCK. Upon filing proof of service of the petition upon Respondent, Petitioner may file a motion to confirm the arbitration award in compliance with the Court's local rules regarding noticed motions. See, e.g., C.D. Cal. L.R. 6-1, 7-3, et seq. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 6 STRUCK PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 9/14/18, DOCUMENT #7 . NOTICE Of Hearing filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co.. To Confirm Arbitration Award (Walker, Lorna) Modified on 9/14/2018 (bm). |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (cw)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, Attachment # 2 Summons, Attachment # 3 Certificate & Notice of Interested Parties and Attachment # 4 Declaration Declaration of Lorna Walker in Support of Petition to Confirm Arbitration should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Respondents Bay City Productions, Inc., Brain Corman, Roger Corman. (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
| Filing 1 PETITION To Confirm Arbitration Award Receipt No: 0973-22379219 - Fee: $400, filed by Petitioner Martin Kenny and Co.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Certificate & Notice of Interested Parties, #4 Declaration Declaration of Lorna Walker in Support of Petition to Confirm Arbitration, #5 Proposed Order) (Attorney Lorna Ann Walker added to party Martin Kenny and Co.(pty:pet))(Walker, Lorna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
