In re Ernest Charles Barreca
Ernest Charles Barreca |
Gertrude Fox and Gerson Fox |
2:2018cv07847 |
September 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Otis D Wright |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 DESIGNATION of Record on Appeal by Appellee Ernest Charles Barreca (Katofsky, Jeff) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of transcripts designated for appeal filed by Debtor - appellee Ernest Charles Barreca. (Katofsky, Jeff) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Appellee Ernest Charles Barreca Ernest Charles Barreca, (Attorney Jeff Call Katofsky added to party Ernest Charles Barreca(pty:db))(Katofsky, Jeff) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 9/10/18. (esa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION Re: Judgment entered on 8/29/18 by Bankruptcy Judge Victoria S. Kaufman, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 9/9/18. Bankruptcy Court case number: 1:15-bk-20466 VK, Adversary number: 1:15-ap-01083 VK, BAP case number: NA., filed by appellants Gerson Fox, Gertrude Fox. (Attachments: #1 BK Dkt) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.