Aaron Linsky v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al
| Aaron Linsky |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv07948 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| S James Otero |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge S. James Otero. The Court finds the following motion suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacates the hearing on MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Aaron Linsky. [ECF #9], set for November 13, 2018. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b). No appearance is required. The briefing schedule remains as set by Local Rule. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 13 REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court #9 filed by Plaintiff Aaron Linsky. (Karczag, Justin) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court #9 Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Remanding Matter to State Court filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Nicole Ivens)(Brown, Tammy) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF LODGING filed [PROPOSED] ORDER re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court #9 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - [PROPOSED] ORDER)(Karczag, Justin) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Muhammed T. Hussain In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court #9 filed by Plaintiff Aaron Linsky. (Karczag, Justin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Aaron Linsky. Motion set for hearing on 11/13/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Karczag, Justin) |
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge S. James Otero. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 12/17/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 1/14/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
| Filing 6 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation, (Foster, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (esa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation. (Foster, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Barbara County Superior Court, case number 18CV04035 Receipt No: 0973-22413530 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, Summons and Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit B - Answer) (Attorney Michael William Foster added to party Lockheed Martin Corporation(pty:dft))(Foster, Michael) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation. (Filed in state court 9/12/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Aaron Linsky. (Filed in state court 8/16/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
