Old Republic Title Company v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
Old Republic Title Company |
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Does 1-100, inclusive |
2:2018cv07957 |
September 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Steve Kim |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Old Republic Title Company. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Smith, Edward) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #14 served on 10/09/2018. (Shanks-Parkin, Hannah) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. answer now due 10/19/2018, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..(Shanks-Parkin, Hannah) |
Filing 13 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Attorney Old Republic Title Company.. (Peeters, Jayne) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #10 served on 09/17/2018. (Shanks-Parkin, Hannah) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 , Order #8 , Order, Set/Reset Hearing #9 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #7 served on September 14, 2018. (Shanks-Parkin, Hannah) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. answer now due 10/10/2018, filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..(Shanks-Parkin, Hannah) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 10/29/2018 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (mrgo) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does 1-100, inclusive, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed by plaintiff Old Republic Title Company. (Filed in state court 8/8/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on September 13, 2018. (Grotzinger, Jordan) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 7.1 filed by Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Grotzinger, Jordan) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., (Grotzinger, Jordan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Grotzinger, Jordan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number EC068890 Receipt No: 0973-22415962 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A; State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B: Remainder of State Court File) (Attorney Jordan D Grotzinger added to party JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Grotzinger, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.