Raul Sepulveda v. City of El Monte, et al
| Raul Sepulveda |
| City of El Monte and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv07973 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 12(f) Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants City of El Monte, Does. Motion set for hearing on 1/14/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Edward B. Kang, #2 Proposed Order) (Kang, Edward) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b) filed by Defendants City of El Monte, Does. Motion set for hearing on 1/14/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Edward B. Kang, #2 Proposed Order) (Kang, Edward) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants City of El Monte, Does.(Attorney Edward B Kang added to party City of El Monte(pty:dft), Attorney Edward B Kang added to party Does(pty:dft))(Kang, Edward) |
Filing 12
ORDER Re Appointment as Guardian Ad Litem for Plaintiff R.S. by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Ordered that Maria Cristina Barrera is appointed as the guardian ad litem for her son R.S., in this action. (sp)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dp)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint ) #1 as to defendant City of El Monte. (esa) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Appointment of Maria Cristina Barrera as Guardian ad Litem for Raul Sepulveda filed by Plaintiff Raul Sepulveda. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Segall-Gutierrez, James) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Appointment of Maria Cristina Barrera as Guardian ad Litem for Raul Sepulveda filed by Plaintiff Raul Sepulveda. (Segall-Gutierrez, James) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Raul Sepulveda. (Segall-Gutierrez, James) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Raul Sepulveda, identifying City of El Monte. (Segall-Gutierrez, James) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by plaintiff Raul Sepulveda.. (Segall-Gutierrez, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Raul Sepulveda. (Segall-Gutierrez, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22418523 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Raul Sepulveda. (Attorney James Paul Segall-Gutierrez added to party Raul Sepulveda(pty:pla))(Segall-Gutierrez, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
