Benito Bautista v. Heung Chang et al
| Benito Bautista |
| DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, HEUNG CHANG and Heung Chang doing business as Franks Liquor |
| 2:2018cv07976 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Heung Chang. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Benito Bautista, (Hong, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Benito Bautista. (Hong, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Benito Bautista. (Hong, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22418902 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Benito Bautista. (Attorney Kevin Hyunjong Hong added to party Benito Bautista(pty:pla))(Hong, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
