Bryan Buchanan v. Christian Pfeiffer, et al
Bryan Buchanan |
Christian Pfeiffer, Robles, D. Ybarra, C. Huckelberry and M. Faulkner |
2:2018cv07987 |
September 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Eastern District of California, 1:18-cv-01368 filed 10/4/2018. (iv) |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani transferring case to Eastern District of California. Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter) (hr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Bryan Buchanan. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendantsM. Faulkner, C. Huckelberry, Christian Pfeiffer, Robles, D. Ybarra pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, filed by plaintiff Bryan Buchanan. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.