Yvonne Mejia v. Pier 1 Imports, U.S., Inc. et al
Yvonne Mejia |
Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc., Karen Roberts, Pier 1 Imports, U.S., Inc. and Does 1-40, Inclusive |
2:2018cv08191 |
September 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Fernando M Olguin |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of Ventura. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Superior Court of Ventura. (iv) |
Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The above-captioned action shall be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Ventura, 800 S. Victoria Ave., Ventura, CA 93009, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv) |
Filing 7 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 11/15/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr) |
Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 5 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-08191 FMO(Ex). (rn) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Attachments # 2 Civil Cover Sheet and Attachment # 4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Pier 1 Imports, U.S., Inc., Karen Roberts., Does 1-40, Inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Yvonne Mejia. [FILED IN STATE COURT 8/14/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 1 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendants Pier 1 Imports, U.S., Inc., Karen Roberts. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 3 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 .(et) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Ventura Superior Court, case number 56-2018-00516263-CU-PL-VTA Receipt No: 0973-22462464 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-3, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Declaration, #4 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney Kimberly Anne Westmoreland added to party Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc.(pty:dft))(Westmoreland, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.