Arlin Potts v. TRS Recovery Services
Arlin Potts |
TRS Recovery Services |
2:2018cv08197 |
September 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Otis D Wright |
Consumer Credit |
47 U.S.C. ยง 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 1/28/2019 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant TRS Recovery Services identifying First Data Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff TRS Recovery Services, identifying First Data Corporation. (Bar-Nissim, Rom) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 With Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant TRS Recovery Services.(Attorney Rom Bar-Nissim added to party TRS Recovery Services(pty:dft))(Bar-Nissim, Rom) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Arlin Potts, upon Defendant TRS Recovery Services served on 10/24/2018, answer due 11/14/2018. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-08197 ODW(ASx). (rn) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant TRS Recovery Services. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (esa) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Arlin Potts. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Arlin Potts, (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Arlin Potts. (Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22462994 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Arlin Potts. (Attorney Amy Lynn Bennecoff Ginsburg added to party Arlin Potts(pty:pla))(Bennecoff Ginsburg, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Arlin Potts v. TRS Recovery Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Arlin Potts | |
Represented By: | Amy Lynn Bennecoff Ginsburg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: TRS Recovery Services | |
Represented By: | Rom Bar-Nissim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.