Brian Whitaker v. Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC et al
Brian Whitaker |
Does 1-10, Bally Americas Inc., Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC and Magnifique Parfumes and Cosmetics, Inc |
Phillip Cook |
2:2018cv08231 |
September 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
S James Otero |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker.(Carson, Chris) |
Filing 30 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Vacate all Currently Set Dates filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carson, Chris) |
Filing 29 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) Phillip Cook: Mediation held on March 5, 6 and 8, 2019 and the case has been completely settled. With the filing of this Report, the parties are advised that they must notify the trial judge's deputy courtroom clerk of the fact of settlement and to promptly file documents regarding the final disposition of the case. Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(Cook, Philip) |
Filing 28 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Phillip Cook has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (mb) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Philip Cook may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. Filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker(Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 26 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge S. James Otero. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: 60 days prior to the motion hearing cutoff. (lc) |
Filing 25 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge S. James Otero. The Court sets the following schedule:Jury Trial: Tuesday, September 3, 2019 9:00 a.m.Pretrial Conference: Monday, August 26, 2019 9:00 a.m.Motion Cutoff: Monday, July 1, 2019 10:00 a.m.Discovery Cutoff: Monday, June 3, 2019.Last Date to Amend: Not set.Settlement is referred to the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program for all further proceedings.All discovery dispute to be brought before the Magistrate Judge assigned to the case; parties reminded of requirements of FRCP 26-1(a); counsel are advised all pretrial documents (as listed) must be filed in compliance with Courts Initial Standing order. Court Reporter: Carol Zurborg. (lc) |
Filing 24 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker.. (Price, Dennis) |
Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC, (Sanner, David) |
Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC.(Sanner, David) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Bally Americas Inc., identifying BALLY AMERICAS INC.. (Yebri, Sam) |
Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Bally Americas Inc Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 19 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Bally Americas Inc..(Yebri, Sam) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC answer now due 12/21/2018, filed by defendant Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC.(Attorney David L Sanner added to party Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC(pty:dft))(Sanner, David) |
Filing 17 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Bally Americas Inc. answer now due 11/30/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Bally Americas Inc..(Attorney Sam Yebri added to party Bally Americas Inc.(pty:dft))(Yebri, Sam) |
Filing 16 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge S. James Otero. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/22/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 2/4/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (vcr) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Magnifique Parfumes and Cosmetics, Inc, identifying Magnifique Parfumes ad Cosmetics, Inc. (Defendant); Brian Whitaker (Plaintiff). (Gilinsky, Alexandra) |
Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Magnifique Parfumes and Cosmetics, Inc (Gilinsky, Alexandra) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Magnifique Parfumes and Cosmetics, Inc.(Attorney Alexandra Gilinsky added to party Magnifique Parfumes and Cosmetics, Inc(pty:dft))(Gilinsky, Alexandra) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Bally Americas Inc. #11 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Proof of Service is lacking required information. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. Service made on CT Corporation, is complete as agent's last name is Missing, only appears as Albert "DOE", and as such missing physical description of the "Doe" who accepted service.. (lc) |
Filing 11 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Bally Americas Inc. filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC served on 11/2/2018, answer due 11/23/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jasmine San Martin, Office Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Bally Americas Inc. served on 10/12/2018, answer due 11/2/2018. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Bally Americas Inc., Craig Realty Group Citadel, LLC, Magnifique Parfumes and Cosmetics, Inc. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22466936 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.