Juan Briseno v. MA Liquor Inc. et al
Juan Briseno |
Does 1 through 10, MA Liquor Inc. and MA Liquor Inc. doing business as Uncle Nicks Liquor Market |
2:2018cv08286 |
September 25, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
George H Wu |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MA Liquor Inc. answer now due 12/12/2018, filed by defendant MA Liquor Inc..(Attorney Michael Joseph Karlin added to party MA Liquor Inc.(pty:dft))(Karlin, Michael) |
![]() |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant MA Liquor Inc. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JUAN BRISENO, (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JUAN BRISENO. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JUAN BRISENO. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22480431 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff JUAN BRISENO. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party JUAN BRISENO(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.