Juan Briseno v. MA Liquor Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Juan Briseno
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, MA Liquor Inc. and MA Liquor Inc. doing business as Uncle Nicks Liquor Market
Case Number: 2:2018cv08286
Filed: September 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2018 Filing 9 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MA Liquor Inc. answer now due 12/12/2018, filed by defendant MA Liquor Inc..(Attorney Michael Joseph Karlin added to party MA Liquor Inc.(pty:dft))(Karlin, Michael)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
September 25, 2018 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant MA Liquor Inc. (et)
September 25, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
September 25, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (et)
September 25, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JUAN BRISENO, (Kim, Jason)
September 25, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JUAN BRISENO. (Kim, Jason)
September 25, 2018 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JUAN BRISENO. (Kim, Jason)
September 25, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22480431 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff JUAN BRISENO. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party JUAN BRISENO(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Juan Briseno v. MA Liquor Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MA Liquor Inc.
Represented By: David E Karlin
Represented By: Larry Scott Karlin
Represented By: Michael Joseph Karlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MA Liquor Inc. doing business as Uncle Nicks Liquor Market
Represented By: David E Karlin
Represented By: Larry Scott Karlin
Represented By: Michael Joseph Karlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Briseno
Represented By: Jason J Kim
Represented By: Jason T Yoon
Represented By: John Yunhwan Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?