Arrowood Indemnity Company v. Team Enterprises LLC et al
| Arrowood Indemnity Company and Royal Indemnity Company as successor to Royal Globe Insurance Company |
| Team Enterprises, Inc., Team Enterprises LLC and Does 1 through 20 |
| 2:2018cv08325 |
| September 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Team Enterprises LLC answer now due 11/30/2018, re Amended Complaint/Petition #13 filed by Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Potente, Alexander) |
| Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Arrowood Indemnity Company amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Company(Potente, Alexander) |
| Filing 12 [Text Only Entry] The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's response to the order to show cause. Plaintiff may amend its complaint by October 26, 2018 to correct the jurisdictional allegations. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Companyto Order, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings #10 Response to OSC and Request for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Potente, Alexander) |
Filing 10
Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Dale S. Fischer (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS) (bp)
|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Company identifying Arrowpoint Capital Corp as Corporate Parent. (Potente, Alexander) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dp)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Team Enterprises LLC. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Company. (Potente, Alexander) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Company. (Potente, Alexander) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22486856 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Arrowood Indemnity Company. (Attorney Alexander Eugene Potente added to party Arrowood Indemnity Company(pty:pla))(Potente, Alexander) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
