April Becerra-South v. Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc./Apple One Services, Inc., et al
April Becerra-South |
Does 1 through 25, Howroyd-Wright Employment Agency, Inc./Apple One Services, Ltd., Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc. and Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc. doing business as AppleOne Employment Services Erroneously Sued As Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc./Apple One Services, Ltd. |
2:2018cv08348 |
September 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Frederick F Mumm |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Stipulation for Protective Order #12 (see attached) (jm) |
Filing 15 ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 14 DAYS #14 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended from November 12, 2018 to November 26, 2018. (iv) |
Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Amended Complaint/Petition #7 filed by Defendant Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Approving Joint Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint By Not More Than 14 Days)(Roberts, Kenneth) |
Filing 13 ORDER APPROVING JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 14 DAYS #12 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended from October 29, 2018 to November 12, 2018. (iv) |
Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Approving Joint Stipulated Protective Order)(Roberts, Kenneth) |
Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Amended Complaint/Petition #7 filed by Defendant Howroyd-Wright Employment Agency, Inc./Apple One Services, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Approving Joint Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint By Not More Than 14 Days)(Roberts, Kenneth) |
Filing 10 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Dismiss (cause or other),,,, #6 filed by Defendant Howroyd-Wright Employment Agency, Inc./Apple One Services, Ltd.. (Roberts, Kenneth) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF INTENT upon filing of the complaint by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Scheduling order to be issued on January 10, 2019. (mku) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First Amended Complaint #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 19-1 Complaint/Petition includes more than 10 Does or fictitiously named parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 7 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant April Becerra-South amending Notice of Removal, #1 , filed by Plaintiff April Becerra-South(Zeif, Aarin) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State Claims filed by Defendant Howroyd-Wright Employment Agency, Inc./Apple One Services, Ltd.. Motion set for hearing on 11/5/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(6), #2 Declaration Declaration of Kevin Kanooni in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(6), #3 Declaration Declaration of Mike Hoyal in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(6), #4 Declaration Declaration of Debbie Guzman in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(6), #5 Declaration Declaration of Sally Malinowski in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(6), #6 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(B)(6)) (Attorney Kenneth P Roberts added to party Howroyd-Wright Employment Agency, Inc./Apple One Services, Ltd.(pty:dft)) (Roberts, Kenneth) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (esa) |
Filing 3 Notice of Non-Compliance with Local Rule 3-2 issued to attorney Kenneth P. Roberts. (esa) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc. (esa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California Los Angeles County, case number BC705971 with conformed copy of complaint. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm, Filing fee $400 paid, filed by defendant Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: April Becerra-South v. Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc./Apple One Services, Inc., et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: April Becerra-South | |
Represented By: | Michael A Gould |
Represented By: | Aarin A Zeif |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Does 1 through 25 | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Howroyd-Wright Employment Agency, Inc./Apple One Services, Ltd. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Kevin Kanooni |
Represented By: | Ryan Paul Tish |
Represented By: | Kenneth P Roberts |
Represented By: | Michael Bruce Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc. doing business as AppleOne Employment Services Erroneously Sued As Howroyd-Wright Employment Agnecy, Inc./Apple One Services, Ltd. | |
Represented By: | Kevin Kanooni |
Represented By: | Ryan Paul Tish |
Represented By: | Kenneth P Roberts |
Represented By: | Michael Bruce Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.