Laila Haoud v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
| Laila Haoud, Lydia Lee Chin and Wellman Lee Chin |
| CitiMortgage, Inc., First American Title Insurance Company, Selene Finance LP, DOES 1-100, inclusive,, Seterus, Inc.,, Does 1-100, inclusive, Omid Hashemi and Seterus, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv08350 |
| September 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1444 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to Amended Complaint/Petition #18 filed by Defendant Selene Finance LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Spaeder-Younkin, Joan) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Settlement and Withdrawal of its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc.. (Ascherin, Preston) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Dismiss (cause or other) #15 filed by Defendant Seterus, Inc.. (Ryan, Timothy) |
| Filing 18 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants All Parties amending Complaint - (Discovery), JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff's Laila Haoud(Anbari, Malalai) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #15 (Ryan, Timothy) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Dismiss #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. See Local Rule 5-4.4.1- Electronic Lodging of Proposed Orders. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant Seterus, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/3/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice) (Ryan, Timothy) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 filed by Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc.. (Yap, Robert) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 12/3/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge Cormac J. Carney. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Yap, Robert) |
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING SELENE FINANCE LP TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #11 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Defendant Selene Finance LP shall respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before December 3, 2018. (iv)
|
| Filing 11 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to December 3, 2018 re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Selene Finance LP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Spaeder-Younkin, Joan) |
| Filing 10 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Seterus, Inc. answer now due 11/2/2018, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Seterus, Inc..(Ryan, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to CitiMortgage, Inc. answer now due 11/2/2018, filed by Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc..(Attorney Preston Konow Ascherin added to party CitiMortgage, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ascherin, Preston) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Selene Finance LP answer now due 11/2/2018, filed by Defendant Selene Finance LP.(Attorney Joan C Spaeder-Younkin added to party Selene Finance LP(pty:dft))(Spaeder-Younkin, Joan) |
| Filing 7 Defendant Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc., identifying Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Retail Services LLC, Citicorp USA, Inc., Citicorp LLC, Citigroup Inc.. (Attorney Robert Ramos Yap added to party CitiMortgage, Inc.(pty:dft))(Yap, Robert) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Seterus, Inc., identifying International Business Machines Corp.. (Ryan, Timothy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants CitiMortgage, Inc., Does, First American Title Insurance Company, Selene Finance LP, Seterus, Inc. Filed by Plaintiff Laila Haoud. #1 [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/30/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL] (lh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Seterus, Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Ryan, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number BC719911 Receipt No: 0973-22493966 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Seterus, Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Proof of Service, #3 Request for Judicial Notice) (Attorney Timothy M Ryan added to party Seterus, Inc.,(pty:dft))(Ryan, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
