Sylvia Adler v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
Sylvia Adler |
WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. a Delaware Corporation, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Does I through 50, inclusive and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
2:2018cv08460 |
October 1, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Fernando M Olguin |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph M Lovretovich counsel for Plaintiff Sylvia Adler. Filed by plaintiff Sylvia Adler. (Lovretovich, Joseph) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT by affiant: Stefan H. Black re Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #9 Statement of Unavailability nd Request to Authorize Shanda Lowe to Appear on Behalf of Defendants for Scheduling Conference filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Black, Stefan) |
Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 to 7 Days, filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc... (Lowe, Shanda) |
![]() |
Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 7 Renewed Demand for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Sylvia Adler [F.R.C.P., Rule 38] (Palmer, Eric) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTIES OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Black, Stefan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Sylvia Adler. Filed in State Court on 8/28/18 Submitted with Exhibit A attachment 2 to notice of removal #1 (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Filed in State Court on 10/1/18 Submitted with Exhibit B attachment 3 to notice of removal #1 .(car) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. a Delaware Corporation, (Black, Stefan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. a Delaware Corporation. (Black, Stefan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number BC719717 Receipt No: 0973-22513009 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. a Delaware Corporation, WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Stefan H. Black, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E) (Attorney Stefan Hocker Black added to party WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Stefan Hocker Black added to party Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. a Delaware Corporation(pty:dft))(Black, Stefan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.