Jason Langley v. El Monte Rents, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jason Langley
Defendant: Does 1 through 10 and El Monte Rents, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2018cv08477
Filed: October 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen L Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2018 Filing 11 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) Modified on 10/12/2018 (hr).
October 12, 2018 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant El Monte Rents, Inc. (hr) Modified on 10/12/2018 (hr).
October 9, 2018 Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice (Other) #8 filed by Plaintiff Jason Langley. (Doniger, Stephen)
October 8, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE of Errata filed by Plaintiff Jason Langley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Errata - Corrected Complaint)(Doniger, Stephen)
October 2, 2018 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant El Monte Rents, Inc. (esa)
October 2, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (esa)
October 2, 2018 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jason Langley. (Doniger, Stephen)
October 2, 2018 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Jason Langley. (Doniger, Stephen)
October 2, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jason Langley. (Doniger, Stephen)
October 2, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jason Langley, (Doniger, Stephen)
October 2, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22516670 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jason Langley. (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Jason Langley(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jason Langley v. El Monte Rents, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: El Monte Rents, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Langley
Represented By: Scott A Burroughs
Represented By: Stephen M Doniger
Represented By: Frank Gregory Casella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?