Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Dafang USA, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Defendant: Dafang USA, LLC, Dafang Sun and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Case Number: 2:2018cv08504
Filed: October 3, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Virginia A Phillips
Referring Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated, upon Defendant Dafang Sun served on 10/26/2018, answer due 11/16/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe, co-occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Pham, Christopher)
October 26, 2018 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated, upon Defendant Dafang USA, LLC served on 10/19/2018, answer due 11/9/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon He Caigin, Person in Charge in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Pham, Christopher)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh)
October 9, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge Virginia A. Phillips for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:18-cv-08504 VAP(AGRx). (rn)
October 8, 2018 Filing 12 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated. (Huerter, Nicole)
October 5, 2018 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendants Dafang USA, LLC, Does, Dafang Sun. (clee)
October 5, 2018 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendants Dafang USA, LLC, Dafang Sun. (clee)
October 4, 2018 Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated. (Pham, Christopher)
October 4, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap)
October 4, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed) (ghap)
October 3, 2018 Filing 7 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B)(Pham, Christopher)
October 3, 2018 Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Adobe Systems Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Pham, Christopher)
October 3, 2018 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated (Pham, Christopher)
October 3, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated, (Pham, Christopher)
October 3, 2018 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated. (Pham, Christopher)
October 3, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated. (Pham, Christopher)
October 3, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22523650 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Christopher Q Pham added to party Adobe Systems Incorporated(pty:pla))(Pham, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Dafang USA, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adobe Systems Incorporated
Represented By: Christopher Q Pham
Represented By: Marcus F Chaney
Represented By: Nicole Drey Huerter
Represented By: Hung Q Pham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dafang USA, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dafang Sun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?