Jeffrey Semonian v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| Jeffrey Semonian |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 2:2018cv08538 |
| October 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Karen E Scott |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Armand D Roth added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Roth, Armand) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Semonian, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 10/11/2018, answer due 12/10/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Region IX. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Drake, Roger) |
Filing 8
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RE PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jdo)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jdo)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Semonian. (Drake, Roger) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Semonian, identifying None. (Drake, Roger) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Semonian. (Drake, Roger) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22528994 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey Semonian. (Attorney Roger David Drake added to party Jeffrey Semonian(pty:pla))(Drake, Roger) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jeffrey Semonian v. Nancy A. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Armand D Roth |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jeffrey Semonian | |
| Represented By: | Roger David Drake |
| Represented By: | Erika Bailey Drake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
