Nobert-Manilisay Cruz v. State of California et al
| Nobert-Manilisay Cruz |
| State of California and Jennifer Karapetian |
| 2:2018cv08586 |
| October 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nobert-Manilisay Cruz. Interested Parties: Gustavo Lavayen, Original Case/Court Judge; Jennifer Karapetian, Prosecution; Santa Maria Criminal Court, Court for original case. (hr) |
Filing 5
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (iv)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (car) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Jennifer Karapetian, State of California. (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Jennifer Karapetian, State of California. Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal.(Filing fee $ 400 FEE PAID), filed by plaintiff Nobert-Manilisay Cruz. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
