Ghodooshim and Son Inc. v. A Gaci LLC et al
GHODOOSHIM & SON INC. and Ghodooshim and Son Inc. |
A'GACI, L.L.C., SOON OK EOM, GLARE FASHION, JOHN WON, A Gaci LLC and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
2:2018cv08601 |
October 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Rozella A Oliver |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 SCHEDULING NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Default was entered by the Clerk as to all defendants on November 20, 2018. Counsel shall file the motion for default judgment on or before December 28, 2018. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 17 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to A Gaci LLC, a Texas Corporation, John Won, Glare Fashion, a California Corporation, Soon Ok Eom (bp) |
Filing 16 First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendants A Gaci LLC, Soon Ok Eom, Glare Fashion, John Won filed by Plaintiff Ghodooshim and Son Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration) (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Ghodooshim and Son Inc., re Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #9 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 served on 10/16/2018. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Ghodooshim and Son Inc., re Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #9 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 served on 10/16/2018. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Ghodooshim and Son Inc., re Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #9 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 served on 10/19/2018. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Ghodooshim and Son Inc., re Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #9 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 served on 10/19/2018. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 11 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:18-cv-03401 SVW(GJSx) (rn) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants A Gaci LLC, Soon Ok Eom, Glare Fashion, John Won. (jtil) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff GHODOOSHIM & SON INC.. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv-03401-SVW-GJS (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by GHODOOSHIM & SON INC.. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff GHODOOSHIM & SON INC.. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 3 Certificate and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff GHODOOSHIM & SON INC., identifying Defendants. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff GHODOOSHIM & SON INC.. (Jeong, Chan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22537897 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff GHODOOSHIM & SON INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C) (Attorney Chan Yong Jeong added to party GHODOOSHIM & SON INC.(pty:pla))(Jeong, Chan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.