Mauricio Alejandro Zuniga et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Carmen Zuniga and Mauricio Alejandro Zuniga |
| Capitol Ford, Ford Motor Company, DGDG 16 LLC, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and DGDG 16 LLC doing business as Capitol Ford |
| 2:2018cv08713 |
| October 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR OMNIBUS REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE REGARDING CERTAIN CLR PLAINTIFFS IDENTIFIED HEREIN by Judge Andre Birotte, Jr.: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation, Master MDL Case No. 2:18-ml-02814 AB (FFMx), Dkt. No. 823, the cases identified in this order, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. See document for further details. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) Associated Cases: 2:18-cv-04709-AB-FFM et al. (gk)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-ml-02814 AB(FFMx). Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-08713 AB(FFMx). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant DGDG 16 LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C) (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants DGDG 16 LLC, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Mauricio Alejandro Zuniga, Carmen Zuniga. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/19/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C) (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Capitol Ford, Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): MDL 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(May, Richard) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Capitol Ford, identifying DGDG Automotive, LLC. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Capitol Ford, Ford Motor Company. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of STEPHEN H. DYE re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Capitol Ford, Ford Motor Company. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC710757 Receipt No: 0973-22554135 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Capitol Ford, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Attorney Richard J May added to party Capitol Ford(pty:dft), Attorney Richard J May added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(May, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
