Design Collection, Inc. v. Unlimited Avenues, Inc. et al
| Design Collection, Inc. |
| DOES 1 through 10, UNLIMITED AVENUES, INC. dba J GEE, Ross Stores, Inc., Unlimited Avenues, Inc. and Unlimited Avenues, Inc. a New York Corporation, individually and doing business as J Gee |
| 2:2018cv08735 |
| October 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Gail J Standish |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Answer #10 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. In accordance with the Notice to Filer Of Deficiencies In Electronically Filed Documents, it is hereby ORDERED that the document is accepted as filed. However, counsel must consult the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #11 and file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than **December 7, 2018.** Failure to do so may result in the Answer being STRICKEN. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mku) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Ross Stores, Inc., Unlimited Avenues, Inc..(Attorney Ryan R Gordon added to party Ross Stores, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Ryan R Gordon added to party Unlimited Avenues, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gordon, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ross Stores, Inc. answer now due 11/30/2018; Unlimited Avenues, Inc. answer now due 11/30/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Design Collection, Inc..(Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (car) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ross Stores, Inc., Unlimited Avenues, Inc.. (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Design Collection, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Design Collection, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Design Collection, Inc.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Design Collection, Inc., (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22556329 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Design Collection, Inc.. (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Design Collection, Inc.(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
