Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. TNT Southgate, LLC et al
Rafael Arroyo, Jr. |
TNT Southgate, LLC and Does 1-10 |
2:2018cv08856 |
October 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Dale S Fischer |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CASE DUE TO SETTLEMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court has been advised by counsel that this action has been settled. Accordingly, it is ordered that the action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction for 45 days to vacate this Order and to reopen the action on a showing of good cause that the settlement has not been completed and further proceedings are necessary.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement jointly filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Grace, Phyl) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter: Defendant(s) did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff must respond to this order within 21 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only,, #8 served on 10/26/2018. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., upon Defendant TNT Southgate, LLC served on 10/19/2018, answer due 11/9/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon MAGANLAL PATEL-agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (jre) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant TNT Southgate, LLC. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (car) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr., (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22573359 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Rafael Arroyo, Jr.. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Rafael Arroyo, Jr.(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.