Melvin Richardson v. The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
| Melvin Richardson |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive and The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv08899 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference 11/07/19 at 11:00 AM. (pg)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE Certificate of Service filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Nalty, Sean) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company.(Nalty, Sean) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT #14 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Defendant Hartford Life Insurance and Accident Insurance Company has until November 2, 2018 to provide its Answer. (iv)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE Certificate of Service filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Nalty, Sean) |
| Filing 14 Corrected STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company.(Nalty, Sean) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE Certificate of Service filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Nalty, Sean) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nalty, Sean) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer #9 for the following reasons: Case number is incorrect or missing. The proposed Order was incorrectly prepared for Judge Birotte's signature. This Court did not receive the required electronic version of the proposed Order. See Local Rules and Judge Fitzgerald's Procedures and Schedules. (iv)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE Certificate of Service filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Nalty, Sean) |
| Filing 9 ***STRICKEN*** STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company answer now due 11/2/2018, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nalty, Sean) Modified on 10/22/2018 Per Order #11 (iv). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Intradistrict Transfer - Clerical Error (G-73) - optional html form, #5 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #7 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #6 the Case has been reassigned from Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-8899 MWF (RAOx). (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Alka Sagar. New Case Number 2:18-cv-8899-AB(ASx). (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Melvin Richardson. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/10/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on October 12, 2018. (Nalty, Sean) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, identifying Hartford Life, Inc. Hartford Holdings, Inc. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.. (Nalty, Sean) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Nalty, Sean) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles, case number SC129811 Receipt No: 0973-22567634 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - Declaration of Haselmayer) (Attorney Sean P Nalty added to party The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Nalty, Sean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
