Paul Biane v. County of San Bernardino et al
Paul Biane |
Hollis "Bud" Randels, County of San Bernardino, Robert Schreiber, R. Lewis Cope, Michael A Ramos and Hollis Bud Randles |
2:2018cv08901 |
October 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Kenly Kiya Kato. New Case Number 5:18-cv-02202 DSF (KKx). (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Paul Biane. Related Case(s): 5:18-CV-00675; 5:18-CV-01597; 5:18-CV-00420 (Galipo, Dale) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Paul Biane, (Galipo, Dale) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Paul Biane. (Galipo, Dale) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Paul Biane. (Galipo, Dale) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22579843 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Paul Biane. (Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party Paul Biane(pty:pla))(Galipo, Dale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.