Richard Q. Le v. BPP Shiraz Park A LP
| RICHARD Q LE and Richard Q. Le |
| BPP SHIRAZ PARK A LP, a limited partnership and BPP Siraz Park A LP |
| 2:2018cv08962 |
| October 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant BPP Siraz Park A LP. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff RICHARD Q LE. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff RICHARD Q LE, (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff RICHARD Q LE. (Tsao, Pamela) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22594196 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff RICHARD Q LE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Pamela Tsao added to party RICHARD Q LE(pty:pla))(Tsao, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
